Twitter - is it really the next big thing in leadership?
Q: Is it true you have started using Twitter?
A: Yes, absolutely!
Q: But surely that’s not your thing? I thought I was the unconventional one. When did you start this up? Why?
A: I just got fed up with not knowing what it was all about….some leaders I respect use it…so I decided to take action and educate myself
Q: How? Did you do a course?
A: It was easier than that. I just went to the Twitter website on https://twitter.com/ and created an account. Less than a month ago.
Q: Isn’t it all rather complicated?
A: No. Put in your name and e-mail address, create a password, and then a user name. Press the button and the account is created
Q: That fast? A couple of minutes and that’s it? What then?
A: There is a “Let’s get started” screen. It will get you to complete a personal profile; putting in some details and a photo, if you like
Q: So then you start Twittering?
A: It’s called tweeting, and not quite yet. You need to follow some people first, and to get some followers
Q: Why?
A: Because although what you post on Twitter is in theory viewable by millions, at first it’s only visible to someone who is following you
Q: So it’s like putting a message in a bottle and throwing it in the sea?
A: I think of it as more like going to a giant party where there are lots of groups of people having conversations, some of which you join
Q: Sounds noisy!
A: Well, you only hear the conversations of the people you choose to listen to.
Q: That’s following, is it?
A: You are getting the idea. You can follow as many or as few people as you like. And can be followed by as many people as you interest.
Q: Which might be only a few?
A: Or none. Lots of people don’t mind, because they done tweet at all, they just follow others to get information
Q: But what’s the point? Lots of people saying they have just had coffee or a crab sandwich, or are at Vauxhall tube station?
A: Well yes, some quite important people do do exactly that…not sure why…but you don’t have to follow anyone who isn’t interesting to you
Q: I’m still unconvinced. Didn’t I read in Wikipedia that Twitter chose the name because of what the dictionary defines twittering as being?
A: You mean “a short burst of in consequential information”? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitter Yes, but it’s not quite like that
Q: Oh come on! The news is full of people being prosecuted for defamation or sexual harassment on Twitter. Hardly high quality stuff!
A: True, but there are also lots of people with genuinely benign intent, sharing ideas. On health, politics, science, compassion, leadership
Q: So whom do you follow, and why?
A: I follow various organisations that are interesting to me as a leader, like @FMLM_UK, @TheKingsFund, @NHSFlufighter, @NHSLeadership…
Q: Whoah! What just happened then? What’s with the @ stuff and the lack of punctuation?
A: Well when you make your profile you get a user name….like @tony_berendt. All your tweets will have this on them
Q: Which means?
A: People can reply to you, or can follow you if they think you are saying interesting things.
Q: So I can converse with organisations or people as long as I know their Twitter name?
A: That’s right. You can tweet them or reply to their tweets. But you need to remember, these replies are public! That’s very important!
Q: Oh? Why is that?
A: Well an American congressman who liked sending intimate pictures of his anatomy via Twitter, recently forgot that to his cost!
Q: Good grief? He thought it would be private and ended up…..?
A: ….yes, thousands of followers saw much more than they expected or wanted! End of job. http://bit.ly/1bNAPJj
Q: Good grief! So what with indecent pictures, libellous allegations, and threatening insults, why are you getting involved with this?
A: it’s a way to pick up information and to pass it on. It’s a way to communicate and engage, potentially with very large numbers of people
Q: I still don’t understand. What will I actually see if I do all this, get an account, and set up to follow some people?
A: A timeline of all the tweets and retweets from all the people and organisations you have decided to follow.
Q: Retweets?
A: Yes. Anyone who likes someone’s tweet (or wants to pass it on for any other reason) can retweet it, passing it on to their followers
Q: But what’s in the tweet? You only have 140 characters, is that right? How can you put across a sensible argument with that?
A: You’d be surprised. It forces you to be concise, that’s for sure. But you can also put in URLs to link to blogs or favourite websites
Q: But URLs are massively long! I know that much. Lots are way over 140 characters. Surely that will put you over the limit?
A: There are websites that will produce shortened URLs, like https://bitly.com/ . That makes it easy to make links to interesting content
Q: They’ve thought of everything, haven’t they? But are these links to things that are actually useful?
A: Absolutely…. breaking news stories; conferences ; clinical guidelines. I got the up to date Cochrane guideline on neutropenic sepsis…
Q: But couldn’t you have looked that up by going to their website?
A: Yes, but I might not have realised it was just out, or have remembered to go there, or have accessed it so easily
Q: Alright, so you can get newsflashes and updates. I can see the value. But surely all the chit chat is a colossal waste of time?
A: It’s not like e-mail. You can dip in and out as you please. And you can search for someone’s tweets by name, or for a topic by hashtag
Q: Hashtag?
A: Yes, like #leadership or #FMLM_blog or #waveofcompassion. You can add a hashtag to your tweet to link into a specific discussion
Q: This is still all too abstract! Can you give me an example of where Twitter has really made a difference to you or your practice?
A: Sure. Last week consultant Dr Gordon Caldwell, Twitter name @doctorcaldwell, tweeted an innovative approach to doing a medical ward round
Q: Which involves?
A: ‘Scribe sums up on ward round. Patient said "That's good summary makes it all clear to me, thank you". Means all have same understanding’
Q: That’s it?
A: That’s what he said in 140 characters. Of course there is much more to it; engagement of the whole team and the patient; improved quality
Q: So you went and tried it out on your own ward round?
A: Yes. And retweeted it. And had a whole conversation about it on Twitter with Dr Caldwell and others who got interested
Q: Don’t you think that’s a bit crazy, taking an idea for clinical practice from Twitter?
A: No, it’s great. The patient, the SpR, and I all liked it. @FMLM_UK members should all try it!
Q: But from a social media website from a person you don’t know? How do you know this chap is even real?
A: Interesting point, but wouldn’t it be crazy to dismiss a simple, intuitive and interesting idea just because it came from Twitter?
Q: I’m still not convinced this 140 character limit can possibly work. How can one have a decent conversation and explore ideas sensibly?
A: Suppose I told you that every Q and A in this blog was no more than 140 characters? We could have had this whole conversation on Twitter!
Q: Touche! So I can listen; opine; converse; swap ideas; communicate with people inside and outside my organisation …hmm….engaging, I guess?
A: I think so. You should of course check out your organisation’s social media policy to stay on the right side of your employer.
Q: Good point. Are there special rules for doctors?
A: Yes, doctors have GMC guidance to follow as well http://bit.ly/13D50c8
Q: So if I try this out….can I follow you?
A: Your choice. @tony_berendt. And I can follow you back to get you going, at least to start with
- Anthony Berendt's blog
- Log in or register to post comments
About the author
Anthony Berendt
Tony has worked at Medical Director level in acute Trusts since 2004 and he is particularly interested in organisational dynamics; their influence on individual, team, and organisational behaviours and performance; and the role of leadership in creating healthy organisational cultures.
Also by Anthony Berendt
-
When targets make you mad: a dialogue on flu vaccination
-
Watch your language! (and you might just find out what you are thinking…)
-
Leadership lessons…from Wimbledon
-
The NHS at 65: on Leadership, and Death
-
Kindness and the Francis Report: A Socratic Dialogue
-
Leadership and flu vaccination: one jab at a time!
-
One conversation at a time